home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: cph-2.news.DK.net!dkuug!dknet!usenet
- From: XSTOF@dk-online.dk (Krzysztof Huryn)
- Newsgroups: alt.2600,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc,alt.comp.virus,alt.crackers,alt.cracks,alt.cyberspace,alt.destroy.microsoft,alt.fan.bill-gates,alt.wired,comp.infosystems.www.browsers.ms-windows,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.win95.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.win95.setup,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.os.os2.misc,comp.sys.amiga.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.adventure,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.misc,comp.unix.questions,comp.unix.unixware.misc
- Subject: Re: I will NEVER buy Windows 95 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :-(
- Date: Sun, 14 Jan 1996 21:27:28 GMT
- Organization: Customer at DKnet
- Message-ID: <30f97536.0@193.89.47.9>
- References: <4d9iri$7n0@news.mcn.net> <4d9ru5$47t@ns2.ptd.net> <4d9vg3$5266@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <30fa02e4.433083@nntp.ix.netcom.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: h9.dk-online.dk
- X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
-
- toadeatr@ix.netcom.com wrote:
-
- >>I read a message from someone in alt.games who had the DOS & Windoze95
- >>version of Mechwarrior2. Guess what? The DOS version ran at a decent
- >>rate, even at 640x480, while the Windoze version was slow as hell.
- >>Can someone explain why this new technologically advanced "OS" runs
- >>worse than DOS?
-
- Because large parts of the CPU are buisy keeping track of all that
- fancy graphic interface, Kernel and all the device drivers running in
- the background, while you're playin' the game. What's so strange about
- it?
- Who wants to run Windows95 just to play games from it, anyway?
-
-
- GodSPEED
- X-stof
- Email: XSTOF@dk-online.dk
- Fido netmail: 2:236/78.43
-
-